Forum

23rd April at 20:26
Simple and actually quite tasty. I used Bitter Truth Falernum instead of my usual Taylor's and I think it blended better with the drink.
16th April at 04:20
I loved this cocktail, but you MUST like an angrcole rhum flavour. It will not be for everyone.
I used a Barbados gold and Neisson Rhum Agricole Blanc over proof. I chose a Barbados rum as Barbados does not allow sugar adulteration to its rum. Many Cuban, Puerto Rico, and Virgin Island rums allow added sugar. Unadulterated rum goes better with Agricole.
15th September 2025 at 03:22
I can't seem to get Clement Rhum Agricole Blanc out here in the provinces nowadays but I did have Rhum J.M Blanc, which is a bit less grassy than Clement, so I upped it to 1/2 oz along with 1.5 oz El Dorado 3-year-old white Demerara rum per F. Yarm's recommendation. This restored Baker's 2 oz of rum, with slightly greater amounts of vermouth (Cocchi) and falernum (J. Taylor). A fascinating, suitably complex but not tiki-grade over-the-top, and harmonious combination of flavors; I never would have thought to combine white Demerara rum, rhum agricole blanc, and dry vermouth in a single drink. Expressed lemon zest seems like the perfect garnish. And it's as crystal-clear as a martini.
14th September 2025 at 06:45
Correct rum?
Review says Havana Club 3 (light gold rum).
14th September 2025 at 14:31
The Charles H. Baker Jr. text instructs to use “finest white rum available” and suggests Havana Club (so white rum, not gold rum. Havana Club is aged and charcoal stripped of color). At Loyal Nine, I used Privateer's white rum gussied up with some Rhum JM Agricole (see either my blog post on CocktailVirgin and/or my article in Punch Drinks). At home when I first made the drink back in 2010, I used El Dorado 3 Year White Rum since it seemed appropriate for the Guyana genesis of the drink (even if they were using Cuban rum when Baker had it, I can't get that here).
14th September 2025 at 09:53
Whoops! Now fixed. Thanks for pointing out.
13th September 2025 at 18:11
Simple indeed, and only slightly interesting.